Difference between revisions of "Talk:Debian"
(Changed apt to aptitude then changed it back. Which is correct?) |
(→Apt vs Aptitude: fixed format issue) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
== Apt vs Aptitude == | == Apt vs Aptitude == | ||
| − | I saw the Package Managers page [[Package_Managers]] and found a [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/767/what-is-the-real-difference-between-apt-get-and-aptitude-how-about-wajig | + | I saw the Package Managers page [[Package_Managers]] and found a [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/767/what-is-the-real-difference-between-apt-get-and-aptitude-how-about-wajig Stack Exchange article] and the top answer says Debian folks prefer aptitude. HOWEVER I recently installed Debian 10 "stretch" and aptitude isn't even installed by default. The "new" version of apt is (super cow powers and all). I hope someone can point to a definitive source that tells me for sure. |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:32, 15 August 2019
I updated and rewrote the page. I tested these install instructions on ubuntu edgy, and added a few words about ubuntu. I also tried to explain the section about package version numbers a little better. If anyone still doesn't understand, I will try and make it more clear. Wuzzeb 04:10, 18 December 2006 (EST)
- Thanks for the additional text. I guess this is indeed a lot more understandable now. --Cstim 04:41, 18 December 2006 (EST)
- I work on Kubuntu 7.04. I followed the instructions (hey, well done!) and everything compiled and installed fine. My self-compiled GnuCash seems to work pretty well and I have a new menu entry for "MT940 import". But when I try to really import an MT940 file I get a dialog box saying "Import module for MT940 import not found." Any idea what I can do now? --Nops 15:47, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
Contents
libaqbanking - Configuring section
I made a very minor change. In the .install file, instead of /usr/lib/libaqofxconnect.*, it should be /usr/lib/libaqofxconnect.so.*, otherwise the -dev package has a conflict with the ofx0 package.
error when building the package... any help ?
Now we are ready to build the package.
$ dpkg-buildpackage -b -us -uc -rfakeroot
end of the log :
#define HAVE_LIBQOF #define QOF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED 1 #define DEBUG_MEMORY 0 #define DEBUG_REFERENCE_COUNTING 0 configure: exit 1 touch configure-stamp dh_testdir # dh_testroot dh_clean -k dh_installdirs make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/feydreva/gnucash/gnucash-2.2.2' make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/feydreva/gnucash/gnucash-2.2.2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
Debian packages
I was reordering the "Installing GnuCash on Debian" section (first part of the page) when Fell suggested another change. I'm not completely happy with my change but I hope it's better. Twt (talk) 17:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Apt vs Aptitude
I saw the Package Managers page Package_Managers and found a Stack Exchange article and the top answer says Debian folks prefer aptitude. HOWEVER I recently installed Debian 10 "stretch" and aptitude isn't even installed by default. The "new" version of apt is (super cow powers and all). I hope someone can point to a definitive source that tells me for sure.
