Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jralls"

From GnuCash
Jump to: navigation, search
(Roadmap)
(Bugs/support for "unsupported" tool Bayes.perl: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Chris, Thanks for noticing. Fixed.
 
Chris, Thanks for noticing. Fixed.
 +
 +
== Bugs/support for "unsupported" tool Bayes.perl ==
 +
 +
Hello, Jralls, many thanks for all your work on GnuCash. Your diligence includes monitoring the Wiki, and noticing the [http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Bayes&oldid=12140 bugs I documented] in [[Talk:Bayes]]. You deleted those notes, and pointed me to gnucash-user@gnucash.org to request support there. 
 +
 +
Fair enough. I want to contribute in the correct way to help GnuCash forward. Still, the issues I was noting are for a Perl script at [[Bayes]], and it says there, "The GnuCash team is not responsible for it and it is provided as-is and you can use it at your own risk."  Do you really want traffic on gnucash-user for a "not responsible" bit of code?  Do you also want bugs on this utility to be filed at bugzilla.gnome.org? If so, then is it all right if I add this after the "not responsibile" sentence in [[Bayes]]?
 +
 +
Thank you again for your dedication. I appreciate GnuCash very much. [[User:Jim DeLaHunt|Jim DeLaHunt]] ([[User talk:Jim DeLaHunt|talk]]) 19:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:16, 11 February 2016

Hello John, please explain your revert at the talkpage of Roadmap. Otto (talk) 14:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi John, you took out the word alias from your last edit of the Editing Git page but I think you forgot to replace it with something better. Regards Chris Good

Chris, Thanks for noticing. Fixed.

Bugs/support for "unsupported" tool Bayes.perl

Hello, Jralls, many thanks for all your work on GnuCash. Your diligence includes monitoring the Wiki, and noticing the bugs I documented in Talk:Bayes. You deleted those notes, and pointed me to gnucash-user@gnucash.org to request support there.

Fair enough. I want to contribute in the correct way to help GnuCash forward. Still, the issues I was noting are for a Perl script at Bayes, and it says there, "The GnuCash team is not responsible for it and it is provided as-is and you can use it at your own risk." Do you really want traffic on gnucash-user for a "not responsible" bit of code? Do you also want bugs on this utility to be filed at bugzilla.gnome.org? If so, then is it all right if I add this after the "not responsibile" sentence in Bayes?

Thank you again for your dedication. I appreciate GnuCash very much. Jim DeLaHunt (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)