Difference between revisions of "User talk:Flywire"
From GnuCash
(→Custom Reports) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Flywire, why did you replace the numbered-list-item tags (<tt>#</tt>) in [[Custom_Reports]] with hard-coded numbers? Markdown provides those so that renumbering is automatic if someone adds or inserts a new list item. [[User:Jralls|John Ralls]] ([[User talk:Jralls|talk]]) 00:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC) | Flywire, why did you replace the numbered-list-item tags (<tt>#</tt>) in [[Custom_Reports]] with hard-coded numbers? Markdown provides those so that renumbering is automatic if someone adds or inserts a new list item. [[User:Jralls|John Ralls]] ([[User talk:Jralls|talk]]) 00:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
− | Yes. Care to share? It didn't support using "1." for each numbered item. | + | :Yes. Care to share? It didn't support using "1." for each numbered item. |
+ | :: Nor does your edit. [[User:Jralls|John Ralls]] ([[User talk:Jralls|talk]]) 03:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:57, 22 January 2023
Custom Reports
Congrats to your contribution!
I wonder if you for one-paraggraph-sections would use
;Header:Text
:More Text
- Header
- Text
- More Text
Regards Frank
P.S. Can you move the page abstract—together with the categories from the bottom of the page—before the first
Flywire, why did you replace the numbered-list-item tags (#) in Custom_Reports with hard-coded numbers? Markdown provides those so that renumbering is automatic if someone adds or inserts a new list item. John Ralls (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. Care to share? It didn't support using "1." for each numbered item.
- Nor does your edit. John Ralls (talk) 03:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)