Difference between revisions of "Talk:Building"
(→wondering about old Ubuntu versions: thanks) |
(→Building with make -jX: new section) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:I think you can safely remove the old stuff - it is always still available through the history. --[[User:Cstim|Cstim]] 09:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC) | :I think you can safely remove the old stuff - it is always still available through the history. --[[User:Cstim|Cstim]] 09:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Ok thanks... I see some "interesting bits" I would like to retain (creating a .deb using checkinstall, for example, and maybe some of the old tricks), but NEXT time I get a few minutes I will clean things up as I suggested. --[[User:Twt|Twt]] 16:40, 25 March 2011 (UTC) | :Ok thanks... I see some "interesting bits" I would like to retain (creating a .deb using checkinstall, for example, and maybe some of the old tricks), but NEXT time I get a few minutes I will clean things up as I suggested. --[[User:Twt|Twt]] 16:40, 25 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Building with make -jX == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had some trouble building gnucash for the past days and I couldn't for the life of me figure out why gnucash wouldn't build. I just added the -j2 options to try and speed up the compiling and when surfing around, this bug popped up: | ||
| + | https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644896 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Would it be a good idea to make a note somewhere in the building section to specifically mention that gnucash doesn't support the -jX (X>1) feature? | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 24 May 2011
Contents
fixing slib issues
On Ubuntu 10.04.1 the path for the guile.init file is a bit shorter than mentioned in the article:
/usr/share/slib/
Thus line 1790 in my slib.scm file reads:
(load-from-path "/usr/share/slib/guile.init")
hope that helps someone
aptitude or apt-get
apt-get build-dep gnucash failed for me. aptitude build-dep gnucash worked Seems like aptitude is more robust and the wiki should be changed.
wondering about old Ubuntu versions
Every time I look at this page I think about ditching the information for the old Ubuntu versions -- as you can see from the wikipedia page link I added awhile back, most of the old ones are not even supported by security updates and any serious person wouldn't be running them EXCEPT maybe to build an old version of GnuCash. So the only reason to keep them around would be "collective memory" -- "that's how we solved (whatever problem), back in the day."
I was wondering if there's a page for old outdated stuff like that. Next time I drop by I will look for it. IF not, maybe I will make one.
- I think you can safely remove the old stuff - it is always still available through the history. --Cstim 09:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ok thanks... I see some "interesting bits" I would like to retain (creating a .deb using checkinstall, for example, and maybe some of the old tricks), but NEXT time I get a few minutes I will clean things up as I suggested. --Twt 16:40, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Building with make -jX
I had some trouble building gnucash for the past days and I couldn't for the life of me figure out why gnucash wouldn't build. I just added the -j2 options to try and speed up the compiling and when surfing around, this bug popped up: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644896
Would it be a good idea to make a note somewhere in the building section to specifically mention that gnucash doesn't support the -jX (X>1) feature?
